Lean Body Mass Calculator

Body Fat Percentage Categories

Body fat percentage is the proportion of your total weight that is fat tissue. The American Council on Exercise (ACE) provides widely-used body fat classification ranges that differ significantly between men and women due to biological differences. Women naturally carry more essential fat to support reproductive function and hormonal health, which is why their healthy ranges are higher across every category.

Understanding where you fall in these categories is far more informative than BMI categories alone. Someone classified as "overweight" by BMI may actually have an athletic body fat percentage if they carry significant muscle mass, as we explain in our body fat vs. BMI comparison.

Women's Body Fat Categories

Men's Body Fat Categories

These ranges are general guidelines from the ACE and may vary slightly by source. Individual factors like age, ethnicity, and fitness history all play a role. For a more personalized assessment, use this calculator alongside our BMI calculator and ideal weight calculator to build a complete picture of your health metrics.

Average Lean Body Mass by Height

The table below shows typical lean body mass ranges for adults at various heights. These are population averages derived from the Boer formula at normal body weight ranges. Your actual LBM may differ based on your training history, muscle development, and overall body composition. Athletes and regular weight trainers will typically have LBM values at or above the high end of these ranges, while sedentary individuals may fall closer to the low end.

Values are approximate ranges based on normal BMI weight ranges (18.5-24.9) applied to the Boer formula. Trained individuals may exceed the high values significantly. Use our ideal weight calculator to determine your target weight range.

The Boer Formula Explained

This calculator uses the Boer formula (published by P. Boer in 1984) to estimate lean body mass. It is one of the most widely cited and validated formulas for LBM estimation in clinical and fitness settings. Unlike simpler methods that only consider weight, the Boer formula incorporates both height and weight, providing a more nuanced estimate that accounts for skeletal frame size.

The Formulas

Worked Example: Male, 5'10", 180 lbs

First, convert to metric: 180 lbs = 81.6 kg, 5'10" = 177.8 cm.

Worked Example: Female, 5'5", 140 lbs

Convert to metric: 140 lbs = 63.5 kg, 5'5" = 165.1 cm.

Why the Boer Formula Uses Both Height and Weight

The inclusion of height is what separates the Boer formula from naive approaches. Height serves as a proxy for skeletal frame size -- taller people inherently have more bone mass, larger organs, and more connective tissue, all of which contribute to lean body mass independent of muscle development. By weighting both inputs, the formula can distinguish between a tall, light person (who still has significant lean mass from their skeleton) and a short, heavy person (whose extra weight is more likely to be fat).

Notice that the height coefficient for women (0.473) is substantially larger than for men (0.267), while the weight coefficient for men (0.407) is higher than for women (0.252). This reflects the biological reality that men tend to carry proportionally more of their lean mass as muscle (correlated with weight), while women's lean mass is more strongly predicted by frame size (correlated with height).

Comparison to Other LBM Formulas

The Boer formula is generally considered one of the most balanced options. The James formula (1976) tends to overestimate LBM in heavier individuals, while the Hume formula (1966) can underestimate LBM in shorter individuals. Studies have shown that the Boer formula provides estimates closest to DEXA scan results across a wide range of body types, which is why it is the preferred choice for this calculator. For more on how body composition relates to standard metrics, see our BMI accuracy guide.

Other LBM Formulas: A Comparison

Several formulas have been developed over the decades to estimate lean body mass from simple anthropometric measurements. Each has strengths and limitations, and they can produce noticeably different results for the same individual. Understanding these differences helps you interpret your results in context.

Boer Formula (1984)

Used in this calculator. Developed by P. Boer and validated against body composition data. Provides a good balance between accuracy and simplicity, performing well across a wide range of body sizes.

• Men: LBM = 0.407 x W + 0.267 x H - 19.2
• Women: LBM = 0.252 x W + 0.473 x H - 48.3

James Formula (1976)

One of the earliest widely-used LBM formulas, developed by W.P.T. James. It uses a different mathematical structure with squared terms for height, which can cause it to diverge significantly from other formulas at extreme heights or weights.

• Men: LBM = 1.1 x W - 128 x (W/H)^2
• Women: LBM = 1.07 x W - 148 x (W/H)^2

Hume Formula (1966)

Developed by R. Hume and E. Weyers, this formula takes a similar linear approach to the Boer formula but with different coefficients. It was one of the first to use both height and weight as predictors.

• Men: LBM = 0.3281 x W + 0.33929 x H - 29.5336
• Women: LBM = 0.29569 x W + 0.41813 x H - 43.2933

Peters Formula (for Children)

The Peters formula (also known as the Peters-adjusted method) is specifically designed for pediatric populations where adult formulas are inappropriate. It accounts for the different body proportions and growth stages of children and adolescents. If you need to assess a child's weight status, our pediatric BMI calculator uses age- and sex-specific percentile charts recommended by the CDC.

• Children: eLBM = 3.8 x 0.0215 x W^0.6469 x H^0.7236

Formula Comparison Table

The following table compares the LBM estimates from different formulas for several example individuals. Note how results can vary by several kilograms depending on which formula is used.

As the table shows, the formulas tend to agree most closely for individuals of average height and weight, but diverge more for heavier or more extreme body types. The James formula in particular tends to produce higher LBM estimates for heavier individuals, which may overestimate lean mass in those who are carrying excess fat. The Boer formula tends to produce the most moderate, middle-ground estimates, which is why it is widely preferred in clinical settings.

Why Lean Body Mass Matters

Lean body mass is not just an academic number -- it has practical applications across medicine, fitness, and nutrition. Understanding your LBM can fundamentally change how you approach health goals, and it provides information that BMI alone cannot capture.

1. Metabolic Rate and Calorie Burning

Lean tissue, especially skeletal muscle, is metabolically active. Every pound of muscle burns approximately 6-7 calories per day at rest, compared to just 2 calories per pound for fat tissue. This means someone with a higher LBM burns significantly more calories even while doing nothing. This is why metabolism varies so much between individuals of similar weight -- the difference often comes down to body composition. According to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH), body composition is a more reliable indicator of metabolic health than weight alone. When you know your LBM, you can calculate your basal metabolic rate (BMR) more accurately using formulas like the Katch-McArdle equation, which is based directly on lean body mass rather than total weight.

2. Drug Dosing and Medical Applications

Many medications are dosed based on lean body mass rather than total body weight. This is because fat tissue has different blood flow and drug absorption characteristics than lean tissue. Anesthetic agents, chemotherapy drugs, aminoglycoside antibiotics, and many other medications use LBM-based dosing to avoid both underdosing (in very lean patients) and overdosing (in obese patients where excess fat inflates total body weight). The NIH body weight planner also uses body composition data for more accurate metabolic predictions.

3. Athletic Performance

For athletes, LBM is a core performance metric. In sports where power-to-weight ratio matters (cycling, climbing, martial arts weight classes, distance running), maximizing lean mass while minimizing fat mass is a primary training goal. Tracking LBM over time is far more useful than tracking weight alone because it reveals whether training is building muscle, losing fat, or both. Our BMI for athletes guide explores why traditional metrics fall short for active individuals and what alternatives to use instead. For a deeper understanding, see our comprehensive lean body mass calculator guide and learn about the relationship between muscle mass and BMI.

4. Nutritional Needs and Protein Requirements

Protein requirements are most accurately calculated based on lean body mass, not total body weight. The general recommendation of 0.7-1.0 grams of protein per pound of body weight is actually meant to approximate protein per pound of LBM. For someone at 25% body fat weighing 200 lbs, their LBM is 150 lbs, and their protein target should be 105-150 grams per day. Without knowing LBM, an obese person might overshoot protein targets while a very lean person might undershoot them. This connects directly to maintaining a healthy weight through proper nutrition.

5. Health Assessment Beyond Weight

Two people at the same height and weight can have dramatically different health profiles. A 5'10" man weighing 190 lbs could be a fit athlete with 15% body fat (LBM of 161.5 lbs) or a sedentary office worker at 30% body fat (LBM of 133 lbs). Standard BMI would classify both identically, but their metabolic health, cardiovascular risk, and physical capability are worlds apart. LBM provides the missing context. According to Harvard Health, body composition is a significantly better predictor of health outcomes than BMI alone. The American Council on Exercise (ACE) emphasizes that understanding your BMI vs. body composition is essential for setting realistic fitness goals.

Methods to Measure Body Composition

While formula-based calculators like this one provide convenient estimates, several clinical and consumer methods exist for measuring body composition with varying degrees of accuracy. The Mayo Clinic recommends professional methods for anyone who needs precise body fat data for medical or athletic purposes.

For most people, a formula-based estimate is sufficient for general health awareness. If you are making medical decisions, training for competition, or tracking body composition changes precisely, consider getting a DEXA scan as a baseline, then use less expensive methods (BIA or calipers) to track changes over time. Consistency in method and testing conditions matters more than the absolute accuracy of any single measurement. Learn more about how different metrics compare in our BMI vs. body composition guide.

How to Improve Your Body Composition

Whether you want to increase lean body mass, decrease fat mass, or both, the following evidence-based strategies will help you achieve better body composition over time. The goal is not just to lose weight but to shift the ratio between lean mass and fat mass in your favor. This approach is far more sustainable and health-promoting than crash dieting, which often results in significant lean mass loss. For general guidance on reaching a healthier weight, see our guide to lowering BMI and improving your BMI.

1. Resistance Training

Resistance training (weight lifting, bodyweight exercises, resistance bands) is the single most effective way to increase lean body mass. When you challenge your muscles against resistance, you create microscopic damage that triggers repair and growth, resulting in larger and stronger muscle fibers. The National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) recommends training each major muscle group 2-3 times per week for optimal results.

• Start with compound movements: squats, deadlifts, bench press, rows, overhead press
• Aim for 3-4 training sessions per week, 45-60 minutes each
• Use a weight that challenges you for 8-12 repetitions per set
• Focus on proper form before increasing weight

2. Protein Intake (0.7-1g per lb of Bodyweight)

Protein provides the amino acids your body needs to build and repair muscle tissue. Research consistently shows that consuming 0.7-1.0 grams of protein per pound of body weight per day is optimal for supporting muscle growth and preservation. For someone who already knows their LBM, using 1.0-1.2 grams per pound of lean body mass is even more precise. Distribute protein intake across 3-5 meals throughout the day, with at least 20-30 grams per meal to maximize muscle protein synthesis.

• Prioritize high-quality protein sources: lean meats, fish, eggs, dairy, legumes
• Consume protein within 2 hours after resistance training
• Whey protein supplements are effective if whole food intake is insufficient
• Older adults may need the higher end of the range (1g/lb) to counteract age-related muscle loss

3. Progressive Overload

Progressive overload means gradually increasing the demands on your muscles over time. Without progressive overload, your body adapts to the current stimulus and stops building new muscle. This can be achieved by increasing weight, adding repetitions, adding sets, decreasing rest periods, or increasing training frequency. Keep a training log and aim to improve at least one variable every 1-2 weeks.

4. Sleep and Recovery

Muscle growth happens during recovery, not during training. Growth hormone, which plays a critical role in muscle repair and fat metabolism, is primarily released during deep sleep. Aim for 7-9 hours of quality sleep per night. Chronic sleep deprivation has been shown to increase cortisol levels, promote fat storage, and impair muscle protein synthesis -- all of which worsen body composition even if training and nutrition are optimized.

• Maintain a consistent sleep schedule, even on weekends
• Avoid screens for 30-60 minutes before bed
• Keep your bedroom cool, dark, and quiet
• Allow at least 48 hours between training the same muscle group

5. Avoiding Extreme Calorie Deficits

While a calorie deficit is necessary for fat loss, extreme deficits (more than 500-750 calories below maintenance) cause significant lean mass loss alongside fat loss. Research shows that aggressive dieting can result in 20-30% of weight lost coming from lean tissue rather than fat, which is counterproductive for body composition. A moderate deficit of 300-500 calories per day, combined with resistance training and adequate protein, ensures that the majority of weight lost is fat while lean mass is preserved or even increased. Use our BMI calculator alongside this LBM calculator to track your progress with a complete picture. For additional strategies, explore our guides on body fat vs BMI and calculate your ideal weight as a target reference.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trusted Resources

For further reading on body composition, lean body mass, and health assessment methods, we recommend these authoritative sources:

• ACE Body Fat Percentage Calculator -- American Council on Exercise body fat classification and tools
• American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) -- Leading authority on sports medicine and exercise science guidelines
• CDC: Body Mass Index -- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention comprehensive BMI resources and guidance
• National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH) -- Research and guidelines on cardiovascular health and body weight
• National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) -- Evidence-based strength training and conditioning guidelines
• Harvard Health: How Useful Is the BMI? -- Analysis of BMI's limitations and the role of body composition
• Mayo Clinic: What's a Good Body Fat Percentage? -- Expert guidance on healthy body fat ranges and measurement methods
• NIH Body Weight Planner -- National Institutes of Health tool using body composition for metabolic prediction

Other Calculators

Related Guides